（致英国女皇、与美国女总统、韩国女总统的信）Letter to the Queen of the United Kingdom, Hillary Clinton, President of the United States, and Park Geun-hye, President of South Korea

我不知道，为什么造物主要使男人强壮，要使女人柔弱。

某些医学说，生物体开始是无交配繁殖的，有可能环境使这种细胞自我分裂、或与别的细胞融合、从而选择了一种“细胞互相交流共享好基因”导致演变分为雌雄的繁殖方式。

但我还是不明白，为什么地球普遍是雄性强壮于雌性，这是几百万年的事实了。但是雌性作为细胞分裂初始之后，她们的优点是什么？会不会有一种可能，她们肯定有胜过雄性的地方，比如皮肤美貌，这是事实胜过雄性的地方，再者，我推想，女性心思柔和圆满，所以我奇怪为什么课堂里教学男性大脑比女性大脑容量大更聪明？因为这个问题，我再推想，是不是男人数百万年来一直在想事情而活动着刺激脑细胞……所以这些活动牵连思维也在活动，导致男人智力更高？但是人类所有细胞的规则是一模一样多的。但我又回想，那么这数百万年来，女性都在干什么，她们会养育孩子，教会孩子说话、会采集食物、会洗衣做饭、会服装设计、会思考游戏……这些活动难道就不牵连思维也在活动吗？——所以很不明白科学界为什么断定男人比女人聪明，就凭脑部大小么，细胞多少么？

1万年前的时候，人类凭借脆弱的语言交流、简陋的石头、粗糙的木矛与狮狼虎豹作生存之斗，那时我们是弱者，但我们最终胜利了。现时代，男女平等在中国已成口号，但事实是没有太多女皇帝，希拉里说美国男人歧视女人，可能有一点点现实因素在内，但我想世界各国的前卫女性已经都像是1万年前的人类，凭着美貌、工作机会平等、强奸法律、挣钱自由恋爱、枪支合法、计算机时代、这些武器在斗争，她们最终会胜利为与男人平等的。至于几百年后什么样子，男人更强，还是女人更强，这还是很难预料的。

男人为什么会这么自私，好像都喜欢风流，玩弄女人，因为冷兵器时代他们力量具有压倒性的优势，有权、有人、有钱，所以缺少这些的女性无奈成为玩物。所以我是很佩服西方基督教的一夫一妻婚姻制的，这简直是圣人制定的法律，约束了男人的恶。因为我活在中国，太了解与憎恶那种三妻四妾制度了，缠脚，三从四德，简直是让男人恶得肆无忌惮，极为丑陋恶心。所以我很奇怪西方为什么会有这种约束男人自私放纵的法律，也很奇怪为什么中国会允许男人如此自私自利，集体缠脚，朕即天下，皇位极端，下跪奴性。也很奇怪，中国女人为什么心怀愤怒却反抗不了，怕男人拳头，但欧洲同样男人拳头大，女人就可以反抗得了。这个研究是很难论断出因果的。

2016年的时候，我曾在杭州计算机学院学习过一段时间，我对同学解释过一些话：英国曾今统治大半世界，但我在网络上从没搜索过哪些说英国人如何如何坏的文章，即使有些国家诸如新加坡，当地人可能会想过英国人曾今掠夺了他们土地上那么多资源，但他们不恨，因为资源本来就是世界的，难道会是不懂开发资源的野蛮人的么？但日本不同，日本侵略中国，要的不是这些东西。

我还说过：在这个时代发明制造计算机已经不是最先进的技术了，因为各个国家几乎都有能力制造计算机了。但是有一种技术，在欧美被列为国家机密，那就是生命学。试想，假如你能发明一种药水，能使人的细胞恢复活力，那么就可长生，起码可以美容，试想一下，如果我发明了一种药水，只要给你打一针，就能让你的皮肤在一个月或一年时间里慢慢细胞如婴儿活跃，皮肤恢复弹性光滑，请问希拉里总统，您愿意支付多少钱购买我这项产品。

所以，在未来时代最先进的技术，就是生命学，延长寿命，不再衰老，这个成功研发时间估计不会太久了，如此一来可真能实现古代秦始皇所说的：寻找长生不老药了。

由此，我随便说说这两个世纪世界各国的整容现象。本来，追求长生是人人的目标，是好事，即使达不到，那么追求美貌也是人人的目标，是好事。可是，整容这个东西它有个唯一的“负面”，它的发明会导致一些恐怖主义、阴谋基地、野蛮军队借用这种技术，来给一个人整容成另外一个人，然后这个名人、这个军官、这个法官、这个主席、这个总统、这个皇后全部变成“恐怖家族”的人了，至于被替代掉的名人、军官、法官、主席、总统、皇后本人的命运是全部被谋杀消失得尸骨不存……

但是基于现代“生命学”的研究还为时尚早，我仅仅提出的是研究细胞进化技术，但如何研究，实为困难。如果要我组织科学家去研究这个项目，我需要一笔庞大的投资经费。然而我们这个时代经济发达，人人爱美，既然已经有全世界这么多医学界在研究整容术，并且取得一定成绩，我睁一只眼闭一只眼，不说他们好坏。我仅仅提个微小的建议，涉及整容医院，这个“合格牌照”在各国应该是要求至高严格的，总不能你明明实现不了面皮吻合技术，怎么有资格给一个人全面整容呢？所以我说的是，整整鼻子、磨磨骨骼、双眼皮、修复疤痕这么少量整整是合乎法律的，因为市场需求。但特别规定的是，不允许你谋杀“大人物”，然后弄个“整容大人物”去替代占据原主人的财产地位，这样你既谋杀，又是抢劫，双罪并判。然而呵呵……我也仅仅是个小作者而已……我说的话……那些恐怖主义听不听，理不理，是他们自己的事，也是法律管理者、文明管理者的事，与我无关了。

然后我也举例说说这种美容技术的优点，比如美国的麦当娜，我怀疑她做过拉皮，不然60岁了皮肤怎么还那么好呢？这是人人皆有爱美之心的好事嘛，是化妆美学艺术，我当然支持了。但我与麦当娜也没真实交往过，所以她有没磨骨骼或什么的，我不知道，我只是觉得她的音乐颇为不错，好似韩国的李贞贤，美国的杰克逊，作为音乐艺术家，我是肯定他们的成果的。但我疑惑的是，能将整张脸的皮肤全部换成另一张脸的皮肤，这个皮肉吻合，能持续多长时间？这就是合格不合格的问题了，如果时间无法长时间持续，整天换皮，那肯定是害人的东西，因为你要想人哪来这么多钱天天换皮的呢？另则，我先前所说的整容负面，就是这种换皮技术，它给恐怖主义、盗贼基地、野蛮军官拿去会怎么样啊，就为了防范这个，逼使现在军队人人都得在手上或脚上安装“监督保卫系统”，以防止战争时候有敌国使用这种技术渗透你的王朝，要不然什么时候你的国家的核武器集体爆炸了你都死得莫名其妙……

2022年，3月，28日，海岛写。

（海岛本人脑里的微型计算机很难取出，不知您们看了此信，能否派遣医疗官帮我取出？）

I don't know why the Creator made men strong and women weak.

Some medical sciences say that organisms reproduced without mating at the beginning. It is possible that the environment caused such cells to self-divide or fuse with other cells, thus choosing a "cell communication and sharing of good genes" that led to the evolution of male and female reproduction.

But I still don't understand why males are generally stronger than females on the earth. This has been a fact for millions of years. But after females began to divide as cells, what are their advantages? Is there a possibility that they must have something better than males, such as beautiful skin, which is a fact that they are better than males? Moreover, I guess that women have a gentle and perfect mind, so I wonder why it is taught in class that men's brains are larger and smarter than women's brains? Because of this problem, I guess again, have men been thinking about things for millions of years and stimulating brain cells...so these activities involve thinking and also activity, resulting in men's higher intelligence? But the rules of all human cells are exactly the same. But I thought again, what have women been doing for millions of years? They raise children, teach them to speak, gather food, wash clothes and cook, design clothes, think about games... Don't these activities involve thinking? - So I don't understand why the scientific community concludes that men are smarter than women. Is it based on the size of the brain or the number of cells?

10,000 years ago, humans relied on fragile language communication, simple stones, and rough wooden spears to fight for survival with lions, wolves, tigers and leopards. At that time, we were weak, but we won in the end. In the current era, gender equality has become a slogan in China, but the fact is that there are not many female emperors. Hillary said that American men discriminate against women. There may be a little bit of reality in it, but I think avant-garde women in various countries in the world are like humans 10,000 years ago. They are fighting with beauty, equal job opportunities, rape laws, free love to make money, legal guns, and the computer age. They will eventually win and become equal to men. As for what it will be like in a few hundred years, whether men are stronger or women are stronger, it is still difficult to predict.

Why are men so selfish? They seem to like to be romantic and play with women. Because in the cold weapon era, they had an overwhelming advantage in strength, power, connections, and money, so women who lacked these had no choice but to become playthings. So I admire the monogamous marriage system of Western Christianity. This is simply a law made by saints to restrain men's evil. Because I live in China, I know and hate the system of three wives and four concubines too much. Foot binding, three obediences and four virtues simply make men evil and unscrupulous, extremely ugly and disgusting. So I am very surprised why the West has such laws to restrain men's selfishness and indulgence, and I am also very surprised why China allows men to be so selfish, collectively bind their feet, and I am the world, the throne is extreme, and kneeling slaves. It is also very strange that Chinese women are angry but cannot resist, and are afraid of men's fists, but European men also have big fists, so women can resist. It is difficult to judge the cause and effect of this study.

In 2016, I studied at Hangzhou Computer College for a while. I explained something to my classmates: Britain once ruled most of the world, but I never searched for articles on the Internet that said how bad the British were. Even in some countries such as Singapore, the locals may have thought that the British had plundered so many resources from their land, but they did not hate them, because the resources originally belonged to the world. Could it be barbarians who did not know how to develop resources? But Japan was different. Japan invaded China for these things.

I also said: In this era, inventing and manufacturing computers is no longer the most advanced technology, because almost every country has the ability to manufacture computers. But there is a technology that is classified as a state secret in Europe and the United States, that is, life science. Imagine if you can invent a potion that can revitalize human cells, then you can live forever, or at least beautify yourself. Imagine if I invented a potion, just give you an injection, and your skin will slowly become as active as a baby's cells in a month or a year, and your skin will regain elasticity and smoothness. President Hillary, how much are you willing to pay for my product?

Therefore, the most advanced technology in the future era is life science, which can extend life and stop aging. It is estimated that the successful research and development time will not be too long. In this way, it can really realize what Qin Shihuang said in ancient times: to find the elixir of life.

Therefore, I will talk about the plastic surgery phenomenon in various countries in the world in the past two centuries. Originally, the pursuit of longevity is everyone's goal, which is a good thing. Even if it cannot be achieved, the pursuit of beauty is also everyone's goal, which is a good thing. However, plastic surgery has a unique "negative". Its invention will lead to some terrorists, conspiracy bases, and barbaric armies borrowing this technology to make a person look like another person, and then this celebrity, this officer, this judge, this chairman, this president, and this queen will all become members of the "terrorist family". As for the fate of the replaced celebrities, officers, judges, chairmen, presidents, and queens themselves, they will all be murdered and disappear without a trace...

But it is too early to study based on modern "life science". I only propose to study cell evolution technology, but how to study it is difficult. If I want to organize scientists to study this project, I need a huge investment fund. However, in our era, the economy is developed and everyone loves beauty. Since there are so many medical circles in the world studying plastic surgery and have achieved certain results, I will turn a blind eye and not say whether they are good or bad. I just make a small suggestion. Regarding plastic surgery hospitals, this "qualified license" should be the most stringent requirement in all countries. You can't be qualified to give a person a comprehensive plastic surgery when you can't achieve the facial skin matching technology? So what I said is that it is legal to fix the nose, grind the bones, double eyelids, and repair scars, because of market demand. But the special regulations are that you are not allowed to murder a "big shot" and then get a "plastic surgery big shot" to replace the original owner's property status. In this way, you are both murdering and robbing, and you are sentenced for both crimes. However, hehe... I am just a small author... What I said... Whether those terrorists listen to it or not is their own business, and it is also the business of legal managers and civilization managers. It has nothing to do with me.

Then I also give examples to talk about the advantages of this beauty technology, such as Madonna in the United States. I suspect that she has had a facelift, otherwise how can her skin be so good at the age of 60? This is a good thing for everyone who loves beauty. It is an art of cosmetics, so of course I support it. But I have never really dated Madonna, so I don’t know whether she has bone grinding or something. I just think her music is quite good, just like Lee Jung-hyun in South Korea and Jackson in the United States. As music artists, I affirm their achievements. But what I am wondering is, if the skin of the whole face can be replaced with the skin of another face, how long can this skin-flesh fit? This is a question of whether it is qualified or not. If it can’t last for a long time, and the skin is replaced all day long, it must be something that harms people, because you have to think about where people get so much money to replace their skin every day? On the other hand, the negative side of plastic surgery that I mentioned earlier is this skin-changing technology. What will happen if it is used by terrorists, thieves' bases, and barbaric officers? In order to prevent this, everyone in the military is forced to install a "supervision and protection system" on their hands or feet to prevent enemy countries from using this technology to infiltrate your dynasty during war. Otherwise, when your country's nuclear weapons collectively explode, you will die inexplicably...

Written by Haidao on March 28, 2022.

(The microcomputer in Haidao's brain is difficult to remove. I wonder if you can send a medical officer to help me remove it after reading this letter?)